Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content

SLOs | Contagion

Student Learning Objectives for Contagion Models Module


Welcome to the Contagion Models module! This module explores how ideas, behaviors, diseases, and innovations spread through social networks and populations. Building on threshold models from our segregation module, we’ll examine both biological and social contagion processes using computational modeling approaches.

Contagion models help us understand how things spread - from infectious diseases to social movements, from rumors to technological innovations. Through agent-based modeling, we’ll explore different mechanisms of transmission, the role of network structure, and intervention strategies for controlling or promoting different types of contagion. We’ll see how Granovetter’s threshold models Granovetter (1978) provide a foundation for understanding collective behavior and social mobilization.

Module Duration: 2 weeks


👩🏾‍🎓 Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)

By the end of this module, students will be able to:

Core SLOs

Conceptual SLOs

Technical SLOs

Critical Thinking

Communication


📚 Readings and Extra Materials

🔒 Required Readings

The required and optional readings for this module are available by 📖 clicking in this link. You have to be logged in with your Calvin account to access them.

  1. 📖 Mark Granovetter (1978) “Threshold Models of Collective Behavior”.

  2. 📖 Damon Centola (2010) “The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment”. Science, 329(5996), 1194–1197.

  3. 📖 Damon Centola & Michael Macy (2007) “Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties”. American Journal of Sociology, 113(3), 702–734.

  1. 📖 Centola (2018). “How Behavior Spreads”. Chapter 3: Social Contagion.

  2. 📖 Watts, D. J. (2002). “A simple model of global cascades on random networks”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(9), 5766–5771.

  3. 📖 González-Bailón, S. (2011). “The dynamics of protest recruitment through online social networks”. Scientific Reports, 1(1), 197.

  4. 📖 Steinert-Threlkeld, Z. C. (2017). “Spontaneous collective action: Peripheral mobilization during the Arab Spring”. American Political Science Review, 111(2), 379-403.

  5. 📖 Smaldino (2023). Modeling social behavior: Mathematical and agent-based models of social dynamics and cultural evolution. Chapters 4 and 5.

📽️ Inspirational Videos

🔗 Online Resources


References
  1. Granovetter, M. (1978). Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83(6), 1420–1443.
  2. Granovetter, M. (1978). Threshold Models of Collective Behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83(6), 1420–1443. 10.1086/226707
  3. Centola, D. (2010). The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment. Science, 329(5996), 1194–1197. 10.1126/science.1185231
  4. Centola, D., & Macy, M. (2007). Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 113(3), 702–734. 10.1086/521848
  5. Centola, D. (2018). How behavior spreads: The science of complex contagions (Vol. 3). Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ.
  6. Watts, D. J. (2002). A simple model of global cascades on random networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(9), 5766–5771. 10.1073/pnas.082090499
  7. González-Bailón, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., Rivero, A., & Moreno, Y. (2011). The Dynamics of Protest Recruitment through an Online Network. Scientific Reports, 1(1). 10.1038/srep00197
  8. STEINERT-THRELKELD, Z. C. (2017). Spontaneous Collective Action: Peripheral Mobilization During the Arab Spring. American Political Science Review, 111(2), 379–403. 10.1017/s0003055416000769
  9. Smaldino, P. (2023). Modeling Social Behavior: Mathematical and Agent-based Models of Social Dynamics and Cultural Evolution.