Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content

SLOs | Polarization

Student Learning Objectives for Polarization Module


Welcome to the Polarization Models module! This module explores how groups form opposing viewpoints, how moderate positions erode, and how social identities become divided. We’ll examine the mechanisms that drive political, social, and ideological polarization using computational modeling approaches.

Polarization models help us understand one of the most pressing challenges of contemporary society: how and why groups become increasingly divided in their beliefs, values, and behaviors. Through agent-based modeling, we’ll explore opinion dynamics, the role of social networks, media influence, and institutional factors that contribute to societal polarization and potential interventions.

Module Duration: 2 weeks


👩🏾‍🎓 Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)

By the end of this module, students will be able to accomplish the following SLOs:

Core

Conceptual

Technical Skills

Critical Thinking

Communication


📚 Readings and Extra Materials

🔒 Required Readings

The required readings for this module are available by 📖 clicking in this link. You have to be logged in with your Calvin account to access them.

  1. 📖 Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129–146.

  2. 📖 Baldassarri, D., & Gelman, A. (2008). Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion. American Journal of Sociology, 114(2), 408–446. 10.1086/590649

  3. 📖 Chueca Del Cerro, C. (2024). The power of social networks and social media’s filter bubble in shaping polarisation: an agent-based model. Applied Network Science, 9(1).

  4. 📖 Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151.

  5. 📖 Dandekar, P., Goel, A., & Lee, D. T. (2013). Biased assimilation, homophily, and the dynamics of polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(15), 5791–5796.

🔓 Optional Readings

  1. 📖 Smaldino (2023). Modeling social behavior: Mathematical and agent-based models of social dynamics and cultural evolution. Chapter 9.

  2. 📖 Petter Törnberg (2022). How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting. PNAS.

  3. 📖 Article: Science Corner: Who is My Neighbor?

🎥 Videos

  1. Political Polarisation

  2. The Rise of Political Polarization -- Goldman Stories: Henry Brady

  3. Liberal vs. Conservative: A Neuroscientific Analysis with Gail Saltz | Big Think

🔗 Online Resources

  1. Stanford Large Network Dataset Collection

  2. Network Corpus

  3. Colorado Index of Complex Networks

  4. Gephi Blog

  5. Kaggle - EDA: Gephi Network Analysis of YouTubers’ Interactions

🛠️ Software Tools

  1. Gephi - Open-source network visualization and analysis software.


References
  1. Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129–146. 10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034
  2. Baldassarri, D., & Gelman, A. (2008). Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion. American Journal of Sociology, 114(2), 408–446. 10.1086/590649
  3. Chueca Del Cerro, C. (2024). The power of social networks and social media’s filter bubble in shaping polarisation: an agent-based model. Applied Network Science, 9(1). 10.1007/s41109-024-00679-3
  4. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. 10.1126/science.aap9559
  5. Dandekar, P., Goel, A., & Lee, D. T. (2013). Biased assimilation, homophily, and the dynamics of polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(15), 5791–5796. 10.1073/pnas.1217220110
  6. Smaldino, P. (2023). Modeling Social Behavior: Mathematical and Agent-based Models of Social Dynamics and Cultural Evolution.
  7. Törnberg, P. (2022). How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(42). 10.1073/pnas.2207159119